These days you can very easily offend by simply not using
the right word or formulation of words.
If you don’t choose your words carefully, your reputation, your actual
thoughts and your actual intentions cannot save you from ridicule and
accusations of some sort of bigotry: racism, islamophobia, etc. Very rarely is some asked to explain
themselves; it is simply demanded that they apologize and say they were wrong. Even then, they will be looked at
suspiciously for a while and every word is analyzed to see if they really were
apologetic and felt that they were wrong, or if they just apologized to get out
of trouble and didn’t really mean it. It
is a public trial by media to determine if they are prejudice or stupid, and
they only get to answer for themselves on the media’s terms: soundbites, yes/no
answers, and always the potential of comments being taken out of context. They are often viewed as guilty until the media
and the public tire of perusing them, or until someone else comes along who is
more entertaining or outrageous in how they offend.
In this environment there is no room for partial support.
There is no room for those that hesitate to either fully deny or fully support
something that has been deemed urgent and important by the talking heads. As a result there is little to no room for
thoughtfulness or exploration of an issue or idea. There is little to no room for compromise
either. This, along with other things
like memes and soundbites, is contributing to the degradation of public debate
and public trust.
No comments:
Post a Comment